Indian Act and the Right to Vote

August 10, 2012

The right to vote, which most Canadians take for granted, was a hard fought battle for Indigenous Peoples. In most parts of Canada, First Nations were offered the right to vote at the time of Confederation - but only if they gave up their treaty rights and Indian status. Understandably, few were willing to do this. Métis People were not excluded from voting as few were covered by treaties, therefore there was nothing to justify disqualifying them. Inuit were excluded and no steps were taken to include them as most communities were geographically isolated so in the absence of special efforts to enable them to vote, they had no means of exercising the right.

Indian_Act_right_to_vote

 

Long before contact with Europeans, and the ensuing Indian Act, Indigenous Peoples had elaborate systems of government therefore many unfavourably viewed the nineteenth century proposal for enfranchisement (the granting of the right to vote to citizens) for two reasons: first, it would mean the termination of their recognition as distinct Nations or people (as signified by treaties with France, Great Britain and later, Canada) which would mean the beginning of their assimilation into settler society; and second, it would mean voting in a system of government that was alien to the traditions, conventions and practices of governance of many Indigenous Peoples. Voting was also considered redundant as a traditional, effective system was already in place for choosing leaders and governing Nations.

 

Download our free ebook Indigenous Peoples: A Guide to Terminology for some usage guidelines and definitions. 

 

Proposals to offer the franchise date back to at least 1885 but were met with hostility within the federal government. The status quo endured for nearly a century as there was little pressure to extend the franchise, although it was extended in 1924 to Indigenous veterans of the First World War, including on-reserve veterans.

 

The fact that so many Indigenous Peoples served with distinction in the Second World War was one of the reasons why it was concluded that the time had come for all Indigenous Peoples to have the full rights of citizenship. In 1948, a parliamentary committee recommended that the right to vote be extended to all Indigenous Peoples. The federal government did extend the franchise to Inuit, who did not have treaties or reserves so were legally considered “ordinary citizens” but Indians who wanted to vote would still have to waive their right to tax exemptions; given the significance of this treaty right, few did so.

 

It was not until 1960, under the leadership of Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, that Indigenous Peoples were offered the franchise without having to give up any treaty rights in exchange.

 

This information on the Indian Act and the right to vote has been reproduced from the 4th edition of our book, Working Effectively with Indigenous Peoples® which is available for purchase on our website, Indigenous Corporate Training Inc.

 

 

 If you're looking for some more free resources to support your goal to learn more about Indigenous Peoples, check out our Free Resources page - you can download ebooks, sign up for info specific emails, access our blog and subscribe to our monthly Indigenous Relations Bulletin. 

 

 

New Call-to-action 

  

Topics: Indian Act

New Call-to-action

About this Blog

Let this blog be your guide to Working Effectively with Indigenous Peoples®. We have hundreds of articles loaded with tips, suggestions, videos, and free eBooks for you. Happy reading!

Subscribe to our monthly Bulletin

Recent Posts

Indigenous Corporate Training Inc., provides information on this blog for free as a resource for those seeking information about Indigenous Peoples in Canada. Readers looking for more detailed information, or who have questions, can sign up for our fee-for-service training. Also, ICT encourages everyone who reads this information to use their best judgment given their own circumstances, vulnerabilities, and needs, and to contact a consulting or legal professional if you have more specific questions. Join the conversation over on our Linkedin page.